As I told you in my last post, I'm back with an investment in Vardia Insurance Group. This time smaller then last time though (10 000 shares).
So why didn't I stick with my investment in Vardia and sold it when the accounting problems were announced and why did I go into it again?
The question is from my perspective simple to answer; When the accounting problems were announced all information I based my former investment in Vardia on were wiped out, since I couldn't trust the information the company had been giving to the market. In other words, no body which invested in Vardia during the time when the accounting problems were announced until last week when Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) did their external diligence on Vardia's bookings knew if they could trust the information from the company and were just gambling. Exactly the same way as going to the Casino and bet on black or red on the roulette table.
-This is the only reason why I didn't keep my shares in Vardia and sold them just after the announcement.
-This is the only reason why I didn't keep my shares in Vardia and sold them just after the announcement.
Now on the other hand, PWC made the diligence and no discrepancies were found, the information Vardia has communicated is solid and the case is from my perspective better than ever at this valuations.
We have seen some positive revaluation of the stock since the PWC announcement were made, around 15% in the time of writing (1.65 NOK per share). I would have expect some more revaluation upwards after the announcement, probably that will come as soon as Pareto Securities (PAS) stops the heavily selling in the stock. Although I'm happy as long the price stays low since its a good opportunity to buy more shares.
Vardia's GWP would at the moment be around 1550M NOK and at a valuation at 1.65 NOK per share we are talking about a GWP ratio on 0.44 x GWP which is an absurdly low valuation and is probably lower then what the liquidation value would be in a worst case scenario. This statement is also backed by what Vardia's peers has been acquired for in the past, how much the customer base has been worth (Aktia 0.61 x GWP, Moderna Försökringar 1.0 x GWP, NEMI Forsikring 1.0 x GWP).
PNL Forecast Q4
If we were looking at the past quarter for Vardia (Q3), the numbers were not perfect, there were somethings which could have been better. Total loss for Q3 were -56M NOK (Q2: -43M NOK) but were impacted by some factors. New management, whichs normally takes non-recurring costs to get clean sheets the first quarter (Q3: -27.5M NOK). The claims ratio were high 97% due to some larger claims which were utilized during the quarter. The operational costs reductions from the new organizational structure were only in place since the 10th August, only the last half got the positive cost impact from the new structure.
If we now look at the forecast for Q4, I expect we will see around the same cost reductions as we have seen from Q2 to Q3 (if you exclude the non-recurring costs) which is a 33% cost reduction. Together with that cost reduction I also think we will have a better claims ratio then Q3 gave us (Q3: 97%), which I think will be around the trailing average the last 12 months, 81% claims ratio. When applying this together with my calculations we should end up with a forecasted loss on around 6-8M NOK and then in Q1 start to show profit. This loss is good and will keep Vardia above the solvency margin until they start to show profit.
Maximum loss in Q4 without being in violations with the solvency requirements are -17M NOK, which is an important number to have in mind for the upcoming report.
As you probably could read, the case in Vardia is tempting and I would say the risk for loosing money at this valuation is small.
Happy new year!
-Eighth Wonder Investing
Full disclosure: Long Vardia Insurance Group
This should not be taken as a financial or any kind of advise and all the numbers on this blog could be incorrectly. I am not taking any responsibility for individuals using this information.
If we now look at the forecast for Q4, I expect we will see around the same cost reductions as we have seen from Q2 to Q3 (if you exclude the non-recurring costs) which is a 33% cost reduction. Together with that cost reduction I also think we will have a better claims ratio then Q3 gave us (Q3: 97%), which I think will be around the trailing average the last 12 months, 81% claims ratio. When applying this together with my calculations we should end up with a forecasted loss on around 6-8M NOK and then in Q1 start to show profit. This loss is good and will keep Vardia above the solvency margin until they start to show profit.
Maximum loss in Q4 without being in violations with the solvency requirements are -17M NOK, which is an important number to have in mind for the upcoming report.
As you probably could read, the case in Vardia is tempting and I would say the risk for loosing money at this valuation is small.
Happy new year!
-Eighth Wonder Investing
Full disclosure: Long Vardia Insurance Group
This should not be taken as a financial or any kind of advise and all the numbers on this blog could be incorrectly. I am not taking any responsibility for individuals using this information.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar